Re: Working on Rules?

[rmundsc@...]

I'm thinking that I'll write the rules for a single piecepack and then 
include optional rules for adding more pieces to have more than 
4 players.

BTW.  Sorry about the double post.  My browser crashed when I 
hit the send button so I thought the post was lost and I typed it in 
again.  

Rob M.

P.S.  Came up with another concept last night so the concept list 
is at 17.   A space empire building game.

--- In piecepack@y..., "Karol" <karol@m...> wrote:
> I second that. MG is working on expansions, to the original 
piecepack, which
> will begin debuting after our newest game, Chesstique is 
released. They will
> be different colors/suits. So, if the game you have in mind 
requires 2 sets
> of the 4 suits or 8 sets of all differentsuits we plan to have you 
covered.
> It would be nice if any game that can be expanded or changed 
to be played
> with more and less players or to take more or less time could 
be modified to
> fit as many conditions as possible to give players the most 
variety in their
> group - even if that "group" is one. The rules can include any 
number of
> options.
> Karol MMB with MG
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jdroscha@g...>
> To: <piecepack@y...>
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:20 PM
> Subject: [piecepack] Re: Working on Rules?
> 
> 
> > --- In piecepack@y..., rmundsc@g... wrote:
> >
> > > The original idea would
> > > take about 2 piecepacks worth of pieces, but it is scaling 
very
> > > nicely.
> >
> >    Also, consider using 2 piecepacks.  Just as many 
traditional
> > playing card games require 2 decks of cards, there's no 
reason not to
> > write games for 2 piecepacks.  Still, if the game is scaling 
well, it
> > may have been a good candidate for trimming down anyway.
> >
> > Game On,
> > James
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > piecepack-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >