[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pryamids done
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: pryamids done
- From: "king_toren_l" <toren_l@...>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 15:00:07 -0000
- In-reply-to: <000a01c1e4bb$49089100$e220fa43@daycare>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I was going over the piecepack pyramids and came across this post.
I am curious as to why you chose not to go with the standard
piecepack numbering scheme. If for nothing else then continuity,
you have the four suits represented and went with 6 mids for each,
why not use the null - 6 system.
Ken
>So, Should I number them starting with the smallest up to the
>largest or the other way around and does the numbering system have
>to go null, ace, 2, 3, 4, 5? I decided that instead of using the
>piecepack numbering system I would assign them the letters A thru F
>starting from the smallest. This leaves it up to the individual
>game inventor to decide how to number the pyramids if it is needed
>and you would just add it to your rules.
>
> Example: A=Null, B=Ace, C=2, D=3, E=4 and F=5
>
> Tim Schutz
>