[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dice Inconsistancy
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Dice Inconsistancy
- From: "Electronicwaffle" <electronicwaffle@...>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 03:44:34 -0000
- In-reply-to: <03f001c383b0$0fb63cf0$6702a8c0@Mike1>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In piecepack@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Schoessow"
<mikeschoessow@c...> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark A. Biggar
> To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [piecepack] Dice Inconsistancy
> >> 1) Are all piecepack dice sets made this way (Arms die
unique), or
> >> is the printing of the dice done in a manner that makes the 2
and 5
> >> orientations randomly interchangeable?
> >>
> >> 2) If all sets are made this way, why? If all sets are not
intended
> >> to be like mine, then I would be interested in hearing if
anyone
> >> else has a set in which the four dice are not identical
regarding
> >> numbering convention.
>
--------------------------------
I just checked both of my sets, one checked out fine, I dentical to
each other, the other had the 4 and 3 in reverse places. (with the
ace on top, two of my dice have the three to the left side of the 5,
the other two have the three to the right.)Interesting, but given it
was hand done, it is understandable. I comprehend the idea of
rotating a die while moving it. I've flirted with this idea before,
and I've even seen a game on the web with this concept. I give the
link in a later post to double check that this is indeed what we are
talking about.