[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New piecepack components? Dice cards and paper dice
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: New piecepack components? Dice cards and paper dice
- From: "kevineagles72" <KevinEagles72@...>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 04:14:52 -0000
- In-reply-to: <401EF531.30903@...>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I would be interested in both the standard card pack for the
piecepack, as well as for your JCD pack with the 8 suits...
I like the secondary value of yours, as it would add another
dimension for designers to use. What I really like though is the bit
pattern, and would like to see it taken to 7 places with a full JCD
set...
--- In piecepack@yahoogroups.com, Porter235 <porter235@y...> wrote:
> I, at one point, was actively working on a piecepack deck of
cards. I
> have the Anchors (Arms) done for the initial prototype. I put up
the
> sample in the files area and made a request for input. I since
have
> looked at it again, and want to make a change.
>
> Each suit would have the following 16 cards
>
> Primary Value / Secondary Value / Bit pattern
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Null / Null / 0000
> Ace / Ace / 0001
> 2 / 2 / 0010
> 3 / 3 / 0011
> 4 / 4 / 0100
> 5 / 5 / 0101
> 6 / ? / 0110
> 7 / ? / 0111
> 8 / ? / 1000
> 9 / ? / 1001
> 10 / Null / 1010
> 11 / Ace / 1011
> 12 / 2 / 1100
> 13 / 3 / 1101
> 14 / 4 / 1110
> 15 / 5 / 1111
>
> The only thing that I am not entirely happy with is the secondary
> values for 6-9 (inclusive). One idea is to introduce a new symbol
(such
> as a star) for all four, which is similar to how I did it in the
prototype.
>
> An idea that I am starting to play around with, which I think I
like
> much more, is having the 4 secondary values be the four suits
with the
> suit of the card being the largest value... so for the sun suit
the
> values would be:
>
> 6 / Anchors (Arms)
> 7 / Crowns
> 8 / Moons
> 9 / Suns
>
> but moons would be
>
> 6 / Suns
> 7 / Anchors (Arms)
> 8 / Crowns
> 9 / Moons
>
> This would mean that each suit has a turn being each value.
>
> Thoughts? Should I even continue? Are people interested in this
idea?