Re: Question for Clark Rodeffer

[cdrodeffer@...]

I should also note that, of course, there has to be at least two
co-authors. Marty, I do hope you enter!

Clark

--- In piecepack@yahoogroups.com, cdrodeffer@j... wrote:
> --- In piecepack@yahoogroups.com, "M. Hale-Evans" <marty@m...> wrote:
> > OK, now *I'm* confused....
> 
> Marty,
> 
> I'm sorry, and I apologize for any confusion I may have caused.
> 
> How about this: If all parties involved and named as co-authors
> mutually agree (1) that all other parties involved and listed as
> co-authors all shared in the actual game design, and (2) that all such
> co-authors are, in fact, credited for their contributions; then the
> game it fits the group project criterion.
> 
> I hate legalese, but for good measure, I'll throw in my standard
> caveat: "If it feels like cheating, it probably is."
> 
> All I want is for people to work together. I want ideas from multiple
> people. If your contributions to the games you and Ron have done to
> date are essential, then yes, you deserve to be credited as a
> co-author, no matter who it was who did what portions of the design,
> whether it was writing and formatting the rules, coming up with
> mechanisms or writing the story line. Does that make sense?
> 
> Clark