[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [piecepack] Re: piecepack logo in heraldic language
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [piecepack] Re: piecepack logo in heraldic language
- From: Porter235 <porter235@...>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 07:51:46 -0400
- In-reply-to: <dc95aa990610042320u78d667adl6a380caeef59fe9f@...>
- References: <dc95aa990609291644t128bb7e4jc7378c0d4af4262e@...> <200610042011.59344.porter235@...> <dc95aa990610042320u78d667adl6a380caeef59fe9f@...>
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.4
On Thursday 05 October 2006 02:20, Ron Hale-Evans wrote:
> Jonathan, what do you think of the blazon? Can it be improved? Is it
> overspecific?
>
> > > A square badge Argent, a cross diminutive Sable, tronconee demembre;
> > > in quarters first a sun radiant Gules; in second a moon decrescent
> > > Sable; in third a fleur de lis Azure; in fourth, a crown vallary Vert.
This describes the specific example that has been created and seen in popular
use. I do not think blazon is designed to be used for much less specific, so
as to accomodate the generic specification.
"make a square divided into quarters like the back of a tile, then
put one suit symbol in each of those spaces:
top-left = suns
top-right = moons
bottom-right = crowns
bottom-left = arms
Can be done in color or all black and white."
Here is my attempt at a "generic" version.
"A square badge, a cross diminutive, in quarters first a sun; in second a
moon; in third; a fleur de lis; in forth a crown."
Here you can find an example of a badge that matches the spec and the generic
blazon, but not the specific one. (Well, not quite, since the JCDpiecepack
uses an anchor instead of a fleur de lis.)
http://www.ludism.org/ppwiki/JcdPiecepack