Re: [piecepack] Combining piecepack with Stonehenge is good to go!

["Jorge Arroyo" <trozo@...>]

I answered in the BGG thread:

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/article/1653341

But to summarize: Even as appealing as the Stonehenge system is for someone
that loves game systems, the restrictions that the publishers have placed on
the distribution of rule-sets are too much. From what they say in their
License Agreement, you cannot publish a game for the Stonehenge system
outside their library. You must first publish it there if you want to
actually release it, and by doing so, you give them all the rights to the
rules...

Philosophy wise, it's the complete opposite from the piecepack system...

-Jorge

On 8/7/07, Rich Hutnik <docreason@...> wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> I have had piecepack, and also Icehouse and Stonehenge.  I am a fan of
> system games because I am a designer.  I inquired with Paizo and
> piecepack.org owner about combining piecepack with Stonehenge and both
> gave a yes to it.  You can see the thread here:
>
> http://paizo.com/titanicGames/messageboards/general/whatAreTheGroundrulesForCombineIcehouseAndPiecepackWithStonehenge
>
> So, if you are interested in combining both, feel free to go ahead
> with it.  Stonehenge adds the following to piecepack: a deck of unique
> card cards, a set of figures, 10 bars in 5 colors, 10 disks in 5
> colors, and a board with a 30 spaced round outer track and also
> several other spaces, 5 plastic Pi shaped monuments.
>
> For designs with Stonehenge, you can go here:
> http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengedesigns/
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>