Re: Font/piecepack.org

["porter235" <porter235@...>]

check Seattle Cosmic Game Night page (http://www.ludism.org/scwiki/) 
it is a wiki. wiki's are very good at creating community as they can 
be edited and maintained by everyone. 

--- In piecepack@yahoogroups.com, "Karol" <karol@m...> wrote:
> Not that I am aware - however if someone does and wants to release 
to public www.piecepack.org is the place to do so.
> 
> I had a request for an "independent" analysis of the piecepacks 
released by all Vendors listed at www.piecepack.org. I was able to
> pass along the write-ups done for MG's sets but haven't any 
knowledge of any created for IcePack's sets. Does anyone else know of 
an
> independent critique? As the community expands I expect more 
vendors to join us, it would be nice for the community at large to 
have
> some way to know what the different sets are like.
> 
> Since we have an open community - I'm curious as to how people 
perceive www.piecepack.org and the associated vendors. Dave and I
> founded www.piecepack.org to be the place that people could go to 
find out information about piecepack, we wanted to make sure that
> everyone would be included and worried that under different 
management it might not be all-inclusive. I didn't really think of 
there
> being any time when I would feel that "conflict of interest" or 
similar notions would apply. Since starting the site, there have
> been a few times that we have held off on projects or features 
because we are also Mesomorph Games. I can assure everyone that we
> haven't any trouble keeping the two separate [MG is only mentioned 
in the Vendor section which is ordered by first piecepack release
> date], the issues are community/public perception and trying to 
keep the community very closely knit. If ever there were any
> problems with any of the vendors, b/c we are MG we feel that we 
shouldn't go public with it. From a consumer standpoint this is
> troublesome for me, since I feel a certain duty to protect as a 
member of www.piecepack.org volunteers. If I were with an
> independent agency and there were the same issues with MG or with 
IPG I'd wouldn't hesitate to go public after all other attempts at
> resolution were made.
> 
> I am very interested in an open and honest discussion about 
www.piecepack.org and the management thereof. Private or public
> responses are welcomed -although I would encourage folks to discuss 
piecepack.org and not MG (I'm not trying to drum up business for
> MG by soliciting comments - as far as I know there are not any 
unhappy customers so I'm not afraid of negative feedback.)
> 
> I'm particularly interested in potential solutions for vendor-
related issues, and first impressions from those that are newest to
> the community. Of course I am also interested in hearing from 
others as well. Please remember that we are part-time volunteers and
> changes may take a little more time than if we were full-timers.
> 
> We are going to be gearing up to overhaul the site this summer, so 
feedback would be helpful.
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> Karol Boyle
> www.piecepack.org
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Clark D. Rodeffer" <cdrodeffer@j...>
> To: <piecepack@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:45 AM
> Subject: [piecepack] piecepack font
> 
> 
> | Has anyone already created a piecepack font?
> |
> | Clark
> |
> |
> |
> | To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> | piecepack-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> |
> |
> |
> | Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> |
> |
> |