[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font/piecepack.org
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Font/piecepack.org
- From: "porter235" <porter235@...>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:44:29 -0000
- In-reply-to: <00d801c3051e$8e3806a0$0501000a@winnt>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I would strongly suggest a wiki. see http://www.ludism.org/scwiki/
for the Seattle Cosmic Game Night's wiki. wiki's are good. real
community.
--- In piecepack@yahoogroups.com, "Karol" <karol@m...> wrote:
> Not that I am aware - however if someone does and wants to release
to public www.piecepack.org is the place to do so.
>
> I had a request for an "independent" analysis of the piecepacks
released by all Vendors listed at www.piecepack.org. I was able to
> pass along the write-ups done for MG's sets but haven't any
knowledge of any created for IcePack's sets. Does anyone else know of
an
> independent critique? As the community expands I expect more
vendors to join us, it would be nice for the community at large to
have
> some way to know what the different sets are like.
>
> Since we have an open community - I'm curious as to how people
perceive www.piecepack.org and the associated vendors. Dave and I
> founded www.piecepack.org to be the place that people could go to
find out information about piecepack, we wanted to make sure that
> everyone would be included and worried that under different
management it might not be all-inclusive. I didn't really think of
there
> being any time when I would feel that "conflict of interest" or
similar notions would apply. Since starting the site, there have
> been a few times that we have held off on projects or features
because we are also Mesomorph Games. I can assure everyone that we
> haven't any trouble keeping the two separate [MG is only mentioned
in the Vendor section which is ordered by first piecepack release
> date], the issues are community/public perception and trying to
keep the community very closely knit. If ever there were any
> problems with any of the vendors, b/c we are MG we feel that we
shouldn't go public with it. From a consumer standpoint this is
> troublesome for me, since I feel a certain duty to protect as a
member of www.piecepack.org volunteers. If I were with an
> independent agency and there were the same issues with MG or with
IPG I'd wouldn't hesitate to go public after all other attempts at
> resolution were made.
>
> I am very interested in an open and honest discussion about
www.piecepack.org and the management thereof. Private or public
> responses are welcomed -although I would encourage folks to discuss
piecepack.org and not MG (I'm not trying to drum up business for
> MG by soliciting comments - as far as I know there are not any
unhappy customers so I'm not afraid of negative feedback.)
>
> I'm particularly interested in potential solutions for vendor-
related issues, and first impressions from those that are newest to
> the community. Of course I am also interested in hearing from
others as well. Please remember that we are part-time volunteers and
> changes may take a little more time than if we were full-timers.
>
> We are going to be gearing up to overhaul the site this summer, so
feedback would be helpful.
>
> Thank you for your time,
> Karol Boyle
> www.piecepack.org
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Clark D. Rodeffer" <cdrodeffer@j...>
> To: <piecepack@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:45 AM
> Subject: [piecepack] piecepack font
>
>
> | Has anyone already created a piecepack font?
> |
> | Clark
> |
> |
> |
> | To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> | piecepack-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> |
> |
> |
> | Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> |
> |
> |