[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [piecepack] Response
- To: <piecepack@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [piecepack] Response
- From: "A. Wilson" <wilsona@...>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:20:41 -0700
- References: <bjrn5j+stt3@...>
For all those who weren't present for the initial complaints, see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/piecepack/message/1095
where the judging of Eric's two games is explained.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Electronicwaffle" <electronicwaffle@...>
To: <piecepack@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:56 PM
Subject: [piecepack] Response
> I added my two cents to two cents already added. Someone new to the
> group asked a question. I clarified one of the rules in the most
> recent competitions. I dont want the new member to have any
> confusion with what the comunity means by
>
> "The game must utilize a piecepack and preferably should
> make use of some of the unique aspects of the piecepack."
>
> Apparently I was confused by this myself, before the judging.
(snip)
blah blah blah
- References:
- Response
- From: "Electronicwaffle" <electronicwaffle@...>