[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Stack Exchange site for discussing board and card games
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: New Stack Exchange site for discussing board and card games
- From: Ben Finney <ben+yahoogroups@...>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:08:48 +1000
- Cancel-lock: sha1:hoMfFz8w8N2g7JW4JKHDzWKKykI=
- Connect(): No such file or directory
- References: <hvcgem+22hv@...>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
"imfurry" <donkirkby@...> writes:
> There's a discussion forum being planned for discussing the playing
> and design of board and card games. It will use a tagging system, so
> focusing on piecepack should be easy if you're not interested in other
> gaming topics.
>
> The site will run on the Stack Exchange engine
[…]
Yay! One thing that keeps me away from a lot of the existing places is
the lack of OpenID authentication. With a StackExchange site, I can
re-use my existing identity that I control.
Now if only BoardGameGeek would also accept OpenIDs, I'd be in bliss.
> If you're interested, please help define what should be on-topic and
> off-topic for the site. Then commit to being a part of the community
> and help with the beta testing.
>
> You can find out more here:
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/5220/board-and-card-games?referrer=7cnqhpc3unJXXXrT0S5BhA2
Done.
A word of advice to people participating in that define-the-parameters
exercise: comment and vote on existing questions a lot, because you only
get to make five question exampless of your own. (Mine were mostly
examples of questions I *don't* want to see on such a site, so I'm
happy.)
--
\ “If [a technology company] has confidence in their future |
`\ ability to innovate, the importance they place on protecting |
_o__) their past innovations really should decline.” —Gary Barnett |
Ben Finney