[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [piecepack] some ideas about the backs of tiles
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [piecepack] some ideas about the backs of tiles
- From: George Harnish <lefou23@...>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:32:20 -0500
- In-reply-to: <4DD60249.6010602@...>
- References: <op.vvrj0ees0gup8g@daniel-pc> <337353.82449.qm@...> <op.vvrkngaz0gup8g@daniel-pc> <4DD60249.6010602@...>
The legacy of older discussions and design considerations have a lot of
value. One of the great values of piecepack is being able to pick up the
rules to a game and know it can be played.
Still, you never know what a new set of eyes, or designs, might come up
with. It would be a challenge to create a repeating hex pattern to fit on a
square. Sketch up your ideas, even if the idea has been discussed and
discarded. Maybe you come up with a solution that hasn't been tried. Don't
lose heart in your creativity!
Some discussion topics repeat themselves in any group that lasts long
enough. I guess that's why FAQs were invented.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Mark Biggar <mark.a.biggar@...>wrote:
> **
>
>
> Oh how history repeats itself. "Checkered vs not" has been discussed
> before in this list at least 3 times (see archive) and James Kyle (the
> original designer) explains why he rejected that in his designer notes
> (see wiki). I suggested the hex lines on the front of the tiles 8-9
> uears ago during the original hexpack discussion. I suggest you go back
> through the message archive.
>
> Mark
>
>