[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [piecepack] some ideas about the backs of tiles
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [piecepack] some ideas about the backs of tiles
- From: "Daniel Ajoy" <da.ajoy@...>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:06:33 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAPx8xWK-AGx0oHZ51sVdphW+97dgUga1vNeoxz3mqMNw+qp9Tg@...>
- References: <op.vvrj0ees0gup8g@daniel-pc> <337353.82449.qm@...> <op.vvrkngaz0gup8g@daniel-pc> <4DD60249.6010602@...> <CAPx8xWK-AGx0oHZ51sVdphW+97dgUga1vNeoxz3mqMNw+qp9Tg@...>
- User-agent: Opera Mail/11.50 (Win32)
There can be a compromise. Two white squares of a thick black border of half the size of the tile, diagonally placed. Those two squares would represent the dark squares, while the two other opposite square areas formed would represent the white squares.
Image attached.
Daniel
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:32:20 -0500, George Harnish <lefou23@...> wrote:
>> Oh how history repeats itself. "Checkered vs not" has been discussed
>> before in this list at least 3 times (see archive) and James Kyle (the
>> original designer) explains why he rejected that in his designer notes
>> (see wiki).